Scott v. Monte Cristo Oil & Development Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff is a physician and surgeon, and brought this action, both in his own behalf and as assignee of other claims, to recover for professional services rendered and medicines furnished to an employee of defendant, which services and medicines are alleged to have been rendered and furnished at defendant's request. Defendant is a corporation having its principal place of business at San Francisco, but at the times mentioned in the complaint was engaged in mining oil and the development of oil lands in Kern county. No question is made as to the rendition or value of the services alleged to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McVayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. RodriguesIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Marquette & Ontonagon Railroad v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Scott v. Superior Sunset Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Medberry v. OlcovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936