Legal Opinion

Prins v. VAN DER VLUGT ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a suit in equity brought by the plaintiff lessee against the lessors to set aside a written lease which the plaintiff claims is unconscionable, harsh and oppressive. The plaintiff leased the premises which are in John Bay, Grant County, for the purpose of operating a physiotherapy clinic. After about a year and a half she vacated the premises and eventually the defendants took possession in accordance with the termination provisions contained in the lease. The alleged hardship to plaintiff resulting from the termination of the lease arises out of the fact that the plaintiff had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Seggebruch v. StosorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  3. Caine v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Title & Trust Co. v. Durkheimer Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Rinaldi v. GollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Stop & Shop, Inc. v. GanemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Baker National Bank v. LestarMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. College Block v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Gourley v. O'DONNELLCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API