Brennan v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to Tecover the amount of two judgments alleged in separate counts, brought to the Superior Court at Waterbury and tried to the court, Robinson, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff upon each count, and appeal by the defendant. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHaul, J.
The first count of the complaint alleges that on the 29th of March, 1901, the plaintiff recovered a. judgment against the defendant, before the Superior Court at W.aterburjq for $3,076.25; and the second count, that on May 12th, 1899, the plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant, in said court, for $118.44. Both judgments are alleged to to be unsatisfied. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff upon both counts. The defendant denies the right of the plaintiff to recover upon both counts, upon the ground that both judgments are for the same cause of action and between the same…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brennan v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Brennan v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Brennan v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Brennan v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reilly v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Fairfield Lumber & Supply Co. v. HermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Johnson v. CookeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Friede v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Navarro v. MartinUnited States District Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.