Legal Opinion
Navarro v. Martin
United States District Court
Decided July 31, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, D. C. J.
The state of demand in this matter was filed by plaintiff against defendant, George E. Martin, as *292owner of the automobile and against the co-defendant, Pearl Martin, as the operator of the said automobile. An answer and counter-claim was filed on behalf of both defendants. It contained firstly, the answer; secondly, a separate defense and thirdly, the counter-claim. The counter-claim is divided into three counts; the first on behalf of the defendant Pearl Martin for personal injuries for which she demands damages in the sum of $500, the second count is set forth by defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Smith v. Red Top Taxicab Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Spetler v. Jogel Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Excelsior Electric Co. v. SweetSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Dilworth v. Yellow Taxi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Johnson v. CookeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reiser v. SimonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Evans v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Ricciardi v. RabinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Lombardi v. MarzulliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Taylor v. Yellow Cab Co. of D. C., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.