Segall v. Zipkin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Contestant appeals from an order admitting to probate an instrument which the trial court found to be a valid holographic will. The appeal is presented upon a settled statement. Contestant is the sole surviving sister and proponents are a niece and two nephews of the decedent. The grounds of contest were : (1) lack of testamentary capacity; (2) lack of testamentary intent; (3) fraud; and (4) undue influence. The latter two grounds were abandoned at the trial.
It has been stipulated that the instrument in question is entirely in the handwriting of the decedent. As admitted to probate, it reads…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Jamison v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Goetz v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Gibson v. QueerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- In Re the Estate of BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Estate of Erickson v. MisakaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.