Rosenheim v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal horn Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 32480 (T. D. 33464).
1Opinion of the Court
De Vries, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbis appeal is from four decisions of tbe Board of General Appraisers. Tbe merchandise was returned to tbe collector of customs at tbe port of New York by tbe appraiser at tbat port in a statement tbat “tbe merchandise in question consists of Amor’s metal polish, an article composed wholly of mineral substances * * Tbe collector assessed tbe same for duty under tbe provisions of paragraph 95 of tbe tariff act of 1909 as an article composed wholly or in chief value of earthy or mineral substances. Tbe protests contain several counts, chief of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bartley Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Salomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Embossing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. KraemerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Holland-American Trading Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946