United States v. Embossing Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26362 (T. D. 31832)..
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Two lands of modeling material, one known as “plasticine” and the other as “plastilina,” which were imported at the port of New York, were classified by the collector of customs as “articles composed wholly or in chief value of earthy or mineral substances,” and assessed for duty at 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 95 of the tariff act of 1909, which said paragraph reads as follows:
95. Articles and wares composed wholly or in chief value of earthy or mineral substances, not specially provided for in this section, whether susceptible of decoration or not, if not decorated in any manner,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Salomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bartley Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. Holland-American Trading Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Lunham & Reeve, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- United States v. EimerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.