United States v. Kraemer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 33222 (T. D. 33668).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
F. L. Kraemer & Co. imported at the port of New York an invoice of “ Goddard’s Non-Mercurial Plate Powder.” The importation is *434concededly in all material respects similar to if not identical with the subject of decision of this court in Bartley Bros. & Hall v. United States (3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 363; T. D. 32961). The article, as its name indicates, is a powder used for polishing plate and other metal surfaces.
The competing provisions of the law prompting this appeal are paragraphs 3, 95, and 54 of the tariff act of 1909, which, in so far as pertinent, read:
3. * * * Chemical compounds,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Bartley Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. BurneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Holland-American Trading Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Philipp Bros. Ore v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Rosenheim v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Betz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Protests 59841-K of International Selling Corp.United States Customs Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.