Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. Walnut Properties, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 2004No. B165538PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, Acting P. J.
Defendants Walnut Properties, Inc., the Estate of George Tate, and the George Tate Trust, appeal from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs Ralph McLaughlin and Nancy McLaughlin in their action for breach of two commercial ground leases. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1
Ralph and Nancy McLaughlin (the McLaughlins) owned two adjacent parcels of land (the land) in Porterville. In 1992, Walnut Properties, Inc. (Walnut) entered into separate 20-year ground leases of those parcels in order to build a multiscreen…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Landry v. Berryessa Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Zavala v. ArceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- In Re T.F.P. Resources, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- In Re GillisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Belson v. Olson Rug Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Marshall v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- D.C. v. R.R.California Court of Appeal · 2010