United States v. Wiener
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Proceeding by the United States to condemn and acquire land for a site for a United States post office in the borough of the Bronx, city of New York. To review a final order affirming the award of commissioners, the United States and Mary A. Randel and another bring cross-writs of error.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Proceeding by the United States to condemn and acquire land for a site for a United States post office in the borough of the Bronx, city of New York. To review a final order affirming the award of commissioners, the United States and Mary A. Randel and another bring cross-writs of error. On cross-writs of error to the District Court for the Southern District of New York sued out by the United States and by Mary A. Randel and Fanny 5. Norton to review the final order of the court confirming the award of…
1Per curiam
The questions involved in the present controversy are whether the commissioners were right in allowing Fanny S. Norton, owner of the premises, 560, 561, and 562 Mott avenue, the sum of $3,890.80 for the machinery of an engraving plant located in the rear of said premises and the sum of $2,500 for damages incident to a change of the location of the business. These questions are presented by exceptions filed by the United States. The United States also excepts to the allowance to the landowners of interest and costs. The owners of the property insist that the various awards are insufficient for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- In re the Application of the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- In re Block Bounded By Avenue A and First Avenue, Fifty-Ninth and Sixtieth StreetsNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- In re Appointment of Park CommissionersSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1888
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. AdkissonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Ralph Sykes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. SeagrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- United States v. Improved Premises Known as No. 46-70 McLean AvenueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.