Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1950 Model Buick, 2-Door Sedan, Automobile

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided December 28, 1955No. Civ. No. 555-WSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

This court decided in Universal Credit Co. v. United States, affirmed by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, 111 F.2d 764 that under Title 27 U.S.C.A. § 40a(b) (3), (d),* the court had no jurisdiction to mitigate the forfeiture of a mortgaged vehicle if the mortgagor, at the time of executing the mortgage and at the time the lien was acquired, in fact had a record or reputation for violating the liquor laws of the state or federal government unless the lienor proved his compliance with the three conditions enumerated in the statute. In that case the lienor got answers…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. ONE HUDSON COUPE, 1938 MODEL, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  4. Universal Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  5. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe CoachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. North Carolina National Bank, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. One 1961 Oldsmobile, 4-Door SedanDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  3. United States v. One 1958 Ford 4-Door SedanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1959
  4. United States v. One 1959 Buick 4-Door SedanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API