Legal Opinion

PAM, S.p.A. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 9, 2008No. Court 04-00082Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMAN, Judge:

This case returns to the Court following a remand to the United States Department of Commerce pursuant to the Court’s order in PAM, S.p.A. v. United States, 31 CIT _, _, 495 F.Supp.2d 1360, 1373 (2007) (“PAM IF). In that order, the Court remanded in part the final results of the sixth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain pasta from Italy, in which Commerce applied a 45.49% dumping margin to PAM, S.p.A. and JCM, Ltd. as an “adverse facts available” rate. See Notice of Final Results of the Sixth Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
Pam, S.P.A., and Jcm, Ltd. v. United States, and A. Zerega's & Sons, Dakota Growers Pasta Co., New World Pasta Co., and American Italian Pasta Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
PAM, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.