Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1986No. 85-2224PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*584TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) appeals from the district court’s denial of a petition to enforce an administrative subpoena issued to respondent Commercial Office Products (Commercial). The two issues presented by this case are whether the EEOC can challenge the scope of the subpoena enforcement proceeding and whether the charge in this case was filed timely under the 300-day filing requirement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5. We hold that the EEOC cannot challenge the scope of the subpoena enforcement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dee Bonnie MARLOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruno BOTTARELLI, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Joe D. URRUTIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VALERO ENERGY CORP. and Jerry Woodson, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANSA PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Grimes v. Canadian American Transportation, C.A.T. (U.S.), Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.