Legal Opinion

Loyd v. Reynolds

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Civil Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.

To the complaint in this case the defendants answered, in abatement, that a suit in chancery was pending in the Circuit Court of the United, States for the district of Indiana, commenced prior to this suit, wherein one Nathan -jBT. Stoelcwell, who was not. a party to this suit, was complainant, and some of the present defendants, and others, not including the present plaintiffs, were defendants, involving the same matter. Such was the nature of this bill that the present plaintiff could become a pai-ty to that suit, and, by cross bill, litigate the same matters and obtain the same relief…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dawson v. VaughanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Rehman v. New Albany Belt & Terminal RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Financial Institutions v. SonntagIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Mauritz v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API