Legal Opinion

Mauritz v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin

Decided November 28, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

Dyer, J., (charging jury.)

This is a suit to recover from the defendant, the New York, Lake Brie & Western Railroad Company, the value of certain lost baggage shipped from New York in June, 1882, bver the defendant’s line of road and destined for Weyauwega, Wisconsin. Many of the facts relating to the shipment and transportation of the baggage in question are undisputed. It seems that the plaintiff and his family and one Schelongowsky were a party of seven emigrants from Germany, who, on their arrival in New York, desired to obtain transportation for themselves and their luggage to Weyauwega,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Myrick v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Grace v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Chouteau v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Quimby v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCollum v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Georgia Home InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Doerner v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. House v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Levensohn v. Cunard Steamship Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API