Schneider v. Bates
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 205, Oct. T., 1911, .by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1907, No. 2,299, making absolute rule to set aside and open judgment in case of Arthur F. Schneider v. William H. Bates and Mary M.- Dulin. Appeal from judgment of magistrate. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was in making absolute rule to set aside and open the judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
This case originated before a magistrate of the city of Philadelphia. It was before us on appeal, by the plaintiff, once before, and, judging by the plaintiff’s claim and the facts alleged in the affidavit of defense, the procuring of a judgment in favor of the plaintiff has depended upon a very sharp point. When the case was here before, the facts and legal questions involved up to that date, were very fully discussed by President Judge Rice, and the court below was sustained in discharging a rule for judg*432ment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense: Schneider v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- King v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Eddy v. SmileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Commonwealth ex rel. Dauphin County v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Davidson v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Caldwell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bauman v. BittnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Greenberg v. Goldman Stores Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Cherelli v. Puleo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1951
- Horrocks v. SkarupskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Sando v. Seeley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.