Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Goldman Stores Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1935No. Appeal 48PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This was an action in replevin by the plaintiff claiming certain dental office equipment upon which levy of distress for rent in arrears had been made by the landlord defendant. The plaintiff was a third party who had leased the office equipment to the landlord’s tenant.

Plaintiff’s statement avers ownership and a leasing of the goods in question to defendant’s tenant; that the defendant landlord levied on the same on January 24, 1934 for rent due and sets forth his alleged right to possession of the goods as follows: “That no appraisement having been duly made, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strong, Deemer & Co. v. DinninySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. McFarland-Meade Co. v. DoakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Potts Dept. Store v. Lutz SweigartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Schneider v. BatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. McCoy v. Royal Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Cash Register Co. v. AnsellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Industrial Loan Society, Inc. v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Mountcastle v. SchumannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Sadler v. MarcoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Kinney v. Russo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API