Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Bittner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1943No. Appeal, 181PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

The net result of the order appealed from in this case is so inequitable that it should not stand as entered.

Plaintiffs brought an action before a justice of the peace against Lloyd Bittner and Maude Bittner, his wife, for rent claimed to be due by them jointly, based on an alleged joint oral lease of a dwelling house, and obtained a judgment against them jointly for $286.61, The defendants appealed, but, instead of entering bail on appeal, deposited as security with the justice cash belonging to the wife in the sum of $288.61. The transcript and appeal were duly filed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cleary v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Deihm v. SnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  4. Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Katch v. Benton Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re BovaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Crowell Office Equipment v. KrugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Gable v. CHINTALASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Davis v. ParkinIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hild Floor MacHine Co. v. RudolphSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API