Long v. Flory & Garber
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of- the Circuit Court of Rocking-ham county in a proceeding by motion for a judgment.. Judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
*722This writ of error brings under review a judgment for $500, recovered by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error as commissions for the sale of his farm. The case was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury.
The material facts from the point of view of a demurrer 'to the evidence may be summarized as follows: In February, 1909, William C. Long, who was the defendant below, listed his farm with the plaintiffs, Flory & Garber, real estate brokers, for sale at the gross price of $16,800, of which sum, in the event of sale, Long was to receive $16,000, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gelatt v. RidgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Parker v. National Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- McFarland v. LillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Fraser v. . WyckoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Kost v. ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leicht-Benson Realty & Construction Corp. v. J. D. Stone & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Mitchell v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Wilson v. Schmidt & Wilson, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Paschall & Gresham v. GillissSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Patton, Temple & Williamson, Inc. v. GarnettCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.