Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Schmidt & Wilson, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 19, 1945No. Record No. 2961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.

On May 2, 1944, the Savings Bank & Trust Company qualified under Code, section 1080a, as guardian of Mrs. Louise R. Westerhold, an incompetent person. i On May 25 the bank listed the incompetent’s dwelling house on Seminary avenue, in the city of Richmond, with several real estate firms, including Schmidt & Wilson, Incorporated. *645These listings were at $16,000, with the understanding that any offer made was to be subject to the approval of the proper court.

On June 7 the bank, as guardian of the incompetent person, instituted a suit under chapter 217 of the Code, for the sale of this real…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arwood v. Hill's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. Leicht-Benson Realty & Construction Corp. v. J. D. Stone & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. Mitchell v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Averill v. O'FarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Lowdon v. LowdonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clark v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Ford v. GibsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  3. Atkinson v. S. L. Nusbaum & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  4. Edwards v. CraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. Beard v. PoeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API