Paschall & Gresham v. Gilliss
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.
This action of assumpsit was brought by the plaintiff, J. I. Gilliss, to recover of the defendants, J. R. Paschall and Thomas Gresham, partners in business under the firm name of Paschall & Gresham, commissions alleged to be due the plaintiff upon a sale alleged to have been made by him, or through his instrumentality, of a certain tract of timbered land belonging to the defendants. The declaration filed contains a special count and also the common counts in assumpsit, to which the defendants pleaded the general issue of non-assumpsit, and to a judgment for $9,000, in favor of the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McGavock v. WoodliefSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Keys v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Hafner v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Kock v. EmmerlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grace Realty Co. v. Peytavin Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Arwood v. Hill's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Dancy v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Wilson v. Schmidt & Wilson, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Eastern Motor Sales Corp. v. Apperson-Lee Motor Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.