Rogers v. Beavers
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. Though the evidence of the trial of a processioning proceeding under Chapter 85-16 of the Code is not sufficient to authorize the establishment of the line between coterminous owners of adjacent land lots as located by the processioners, yet it is error to dismiss the entire proceeding on the ground that it is the province of the processioners to survey and mark anew established lines as they actually exist, and because they are without authority to run a new line, where the evidence as a whole authorizes the jury to establish such dividing line other than as located by the processioners.
2.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Amos v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Cosby v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Roper Wholesale Grocery Co. v. FaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Wheeler v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Page v. GuinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Purcell v. C. Goldstein & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Whitlock v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949