Legal Opinion
In Re Gullatt
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 23, 1994No. Bankruptcy 93-01083-GP3-13PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEITH M. LUNDIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The question presented is whether a tardy claim is allowable in a Chapter 13 case. Late filing does not require disallowance. The following are findings of fact and conclusions of law. Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7052.
I
Connie and Sandra Gullatt filed Chapter 13 on February 11, 1993. Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3002(c), 1 timely proofs of claim were due before June 16, 1993. On August 16, 1993, the Veterans’ Administration filed proof of an unsecured claim for $13,966.95. The debtors objected to allowance of the V.A.’s claim on the ground it was untimely.
II
Chief…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Cardinal Mine Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In Re HausladenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re DennisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- In Re ArkellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994
- In Re FriesenhahnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1994
- United States v. Vecchio (In re Vecchio)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Gullatt v. United States (In Re Gullatt)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.