Legal Opinion
Gullatt v. United States (In Re Gullatt)
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 7, 1994No. 3:94-0229PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the bankruptcy court’s ruling that a creditor’s tardily filed claim is allowable in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, 164 B.R. 279. This court reverses the bankruptcy court and holds that the tardily filed claims of Chapter 13 creditors are not allowable.
I
Connie and Sandra Gullatt filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy on February 11, 1993. Pursuant to Rule 3002 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, creditors’ proofs of claims were due before June 16, 1993. Despite receiving proper notice of the bankruptcy, the Veterans Administration…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Cardinal Mine Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In Re HausladenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- In Re ZimmermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re DennisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Aboody v. United States (In Re Aboody)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1998
- In Re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Lott Furniture, Inc. v. Ricks (In Re Ricks)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2000
- In Re BargdillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.