United States v. Robert L. Miller and Mildred M. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
The issue is whether the appellee taxpayers can recover a total of $64,000 mistakenly paid by them as estimated federal income tax for years when they owed no tax. The trial court overruled the defense of the statute of limitations asserted by the government and gave the taxpayers .the judgment which they sought. 1
The applicable statute of limitations, § 322(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, provides in its subsection (1) that a claim for refund must be presented •within three years from the time of the
filing of a return and in its subsection (2) (A) that a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Jones v. Liberty Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lewyt Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Kavanagh v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tedroe J. Ford, Jr. And Margaret Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- David F. Ertman and Jane Ertman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Charles Leich and Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Michael C. Weigand and Lois M. Weigand v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Danoff v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.