Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert L. Miller and Mildred M. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1963No. 7100_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The issue is whether the appellee taxpayers can recover a total of $64,000 mistakenly paid by them as estimated federal income tax for years when they owed no tax. The trial court overruled the defense of the statute of limitations asserted by the government and gave the taxpayers .the judgment which they sought. 1

The applicable statute of limitations, § 322(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, provides in its subsection (1) that a claim for refund must be presented •within three years from the time of the

filing of a return and in its subsection (2) (A) that a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Jones v. Liberty Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Lewyt Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Kavanagh v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tedroe J. Ford, Jr. And Margaret Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. David F. Ertman and Jane Ertman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Charles Leich and Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Michael C. Weigand and Lois M. Weigand v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Danoff v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API