Legal Opinion

Danoff v. United States

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 7, 2004No. SA CV03-945-JVS(ANX)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATEMENT OF UNCONTROVERTED FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

SELNA, District Judge.

The Motion to Dismiss Complaint, or Alternatively, for Summary Judgment filed by defendant, the United States of America, came on for hearing before the Court, the Honorable James V. Selna, United States District Judge, presiding, at the date, time, and place shown above. Based upon the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the arguments made by the parties at the hearing on such Motion, and all matters properly part of the record, the Court makes the following Statement of Uncontroverted Facts…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Babcock v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  2. Fleetboston Financial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Ferguson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Dickow v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  5. Candor v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API