Legal Opinion
Michael C. Weigand and Lois M. Weigand v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 1, 1985No. 84-1224PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a), Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.
The plaintiff taxpayers instituted this suit for a refund of income taxes that they claimed were overpaid for the tax year 1975. On April 15, 1976, the taxpayers submitted a Form 4868 (Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File), which granted them an automatic…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Robert L. Miller and Mildred M. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by25 opinions
- David F. Ertman and Jane Ertman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Solomon Blatt, Jr., as of the Estate of Solomon Blatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Boensel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- William K. Vancanagan, in His Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ford Bovey, and Sharon Bovey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Risman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.