Legal Opinion

Cadena v. Dicker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 25, 1964No. 16409PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

The appellee Edward T. Dicker obtained á judgment against the appellant Milo v. Cadena for the balance claimed to be owing on a promissory note signed by appellant and payable to appellee. Appellant had filed a plea of privilege but on October 10, 1963 his attorney telegraphed appellee’s attorney agreeing that the plea of privilege be overruled. This was done on October 11, 1963, and at the same time, no answer having been filed, a nihil dicit judgment was rendered. On November 7, 1963 appellant filed a motion for new trial, which was heard on December 13, 1963, and, no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Dowell v. WintersTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Bering Mfg. Co. v. W. T. Carter & Bro.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Bering Mfg. Co. v. W. T. Carter & Bro.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. Alabama Oil Pipe Line Co. v. the Sun Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ferguson & Co. v. Roll, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Butler v. Dal Tex MacH. & Tool Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Republic Bankers Life Insurance Company v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Kirk v. Farmers Aerial Spraying Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Spears v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API