Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Farmers Aerial Spraying Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1973No. 8363PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment overruling a motion for new trial in a suit in which a default judgment was granted after the defendant had answered but failed to appear when the case was called for trial. Reversed and remanded.

Farmers Aerial Spraying Service, Inc., plaintiff-appellee, brought suit on a sworn account alleged to be due and owing by A. D. Kirk, defendant-appellant, for goods, wares, merchandise and/or services furnished, together with interest and attorney’s fees. The plaintiff’s original petition was filed on January 18, 1972. The defendant’s original…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. City of Fort Worth v. GauseTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Dowell v. WintersTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Griffin v. DutyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nguyen v. Kim, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Melton v. Ryander, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  3. Marine Transport Corp. v. Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Poindexter v. BonsukanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
  5. Presbyterian Healthcare Systems v. Afangideh, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API