Ferguson & Co. v. Roll
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice.
Appellant, Ferguson & Co., appeals a denial of its motion for new trial, which was filed in an attempt to set aside a default judgment rendered against it and in favor of appellee, Doug Roll d/b/a Front-line Search (Roll). Because we find that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling Ferguson & Co.’s motion for new trial, we sustain Ferguson & Co.’s second point of error and reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
On May 23, 1988, Roll filed suit against Ferguson & Co., alleging that Ferguson & Co. had…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Angelo v. Champion Restaurant Equipment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Knie v. Piskun, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Jackson v. Mares, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Custom-Crete, Inc. v. K-Bar Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Polk v. Southwest Crossing Homeowners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Hanners v. State Bar of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.