Legal Opinion

Ferguson & Co. v. Roll

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 21, 1989No. 05-88-01382-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

Appellant, Ferguson & Co., appeals a denial of its motion for new trial, which was filed in an attempt to set aside a default judgment rendered against it and in favor of appellee, Doug Roll d/b/a Front-line Search (Roll). Because we find that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling Ferguson & Co.’s motion for new trial, we sustain Ferguson & Co.’s second point of error and reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

On May 23, 1988, Roll filed suit against Ferguson & Co., alleging that Ferguson & Co. had…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Angelo v. Champion Restaurant Equipment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Knie v. Piskun, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  2. Jackson v. Mares, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  3. Custom-Crete, Inc. v. K-Bar Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. Polk v. Southwest Crossing Homeowners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  5. Hanners v. State Bar of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API