Legal Opinion
United States v. Drake
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 13, 2011No. Criminal No. RDB 10-181PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.
The Defendant, Thomas A. Drake (“Mr. Drake” or “Defendant”), has filed the pending motions challenging (1) the constitutionality of Sections 5 & 6 of the Classified Information Procedures Act (“CIPA”), 18 U.S.C.App. III, and (2) Counts 1 through 5 of the Indictment as unconstitutionally vague. The issues have been fully briefed and a hearing was held on Thursday, March 31, 2011. For the reasons indicated on the record and those set forth below, Defendant’s Motion for a Declaration that Sections 5 & 6 of CIPA are Unconstitutional (ECF No.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HitselbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. KiriakouDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- United States v. HausaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- United States v. HitselbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013