Legal Opinion

United States v. Hitselberger

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 6, 2013No. Criminal No. 2012-0231PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Re Document No.: 36

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying Defendant’s Motion For Declaration That Sections 5 And 6 of the Classified Information Procedures Act Are Unconstitutional

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Mr. Hitselberger, has been charged by the United States of America on three counts of violating 18 U.S.C. Section 793(e), for knowingly removing and retaining classified information from a secure location. He has also been charged on three counts of violating 18 U.S.C. 3238, for unlawfully removing public documents from their secured location. Prior to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HausaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API