United States v. Hitselberger
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document No.: 36
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Defendant’s Motion For Declaration That Sections 5 And 6 of the Classified Information Procedures Act Are Unconstitutional
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, Mr. Hitselberger, has been charged by the United States of America on three counts of violating 18 U.S.C. Section 793(e), for knowingly removing and retaining classified information from a secure location. He has also been charged on three counts of violating 18 U.S.C. 3238, for unlawfully removing public documents from their secured location. Prior to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HausaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017