Legal Opinion

United States v. Hitselberger

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 3, 2013No. Criminal No. 2012-0231Published

1Opinion of the Court

Re Document No.: 40

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying Defendant’s Motion to find 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Mr. Hitselberger, has been charged by the United States of America on three counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 793(e), for willfully removing and retaining documents relating to the national defense. He has also been charged on three counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2071(a), for willfully and unlawfully removing public documents from their secured location. Count one charges Mr. Hitselberger for the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API