United States v. Hitselberger
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document No.: 40
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Defendant’s Motion to find 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, Mr. Hitselberger, has been charged by the United States of America on three counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 793(e), for willfully removing and retaining documents relating to the national defense. He has also been charged on three counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2071(a), for willfully and unlawfully removing public documents from their secured location. Count one charges Mr. Hitselberger for the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.