Legal Opinion

United States v. Kiriakou

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 16, 2012No. 1:12cr127 (LMB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.

The issue of scienter has arisen in the defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents, specifically in categories (1) and (3) of the defendant’s requests for production, which requests have been denied. See Def.’s Mot. to Compel Produc. of Docs, and Mem. in Supp. of Mot. [Dkt. No. 66 (original), Dkt. No. 99 (redacted) ] (“Def.’s Mot. to Compel”) at 2-3; Order of October 1, 2012 [Dkt. No. 80] (granting in part and denying in part defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents). The information covered by these requests relates…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Gorin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, United States of America v. Ronald Louis HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Abu-JihaadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Samuel Loring Morison, the Washington Post Cbs, Inc., Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HitselbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API