Legal Opinion

Equitable Life, C., U.S. v. Rothstein

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 19, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this case asks for the reformation of an insurance policy issued by the complainant to the defendant Samuel Rothstein and also asks that the defendants be restrained from continuing or bringing an action at law for recovery of disability benefits under the policy as it existed at the time this bill was filed. Complainant seeks reformation in such manner that the true age of the defendant Samuel Rothstein will appear in the policy in place of his age now stated therein.

The policy was issued on March 11th, 1925. The defendant Samuel Rothstein in his application for the insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois Bankers' Life Association v. ByasseeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. LeonardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. ConnallonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Paul Revere Life Insurance v. HaasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Richardson v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Prudential Ins. Co. Of America v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  5. Ginsberg v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API