Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1940No. 6 Div. 752PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Bill in equity for reformation of a policy of life insurance. It is filed by the insurer against the insured.while living. Specifically, it seeks to strike the sum stipulated as the death benefit on the face of the policy,' and insert, in lieu thereof, the sum alleged to be payable under the age adjustment clause. The appeal is from a decree overruling demurrers to the bill as amended.

The bill alleges: In the application for the policy, dated November 29, 1916, the insured stated the date of his birth to be July 15, 1881, and his age, nearest birthday, 35; that in fact the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Stean v. Occidental Life Ins.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Darden v. North American Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Langan v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Thomas v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Clark v. Ala. Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Prudential Ins. Co. Of America v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API