Legal Opinion
Washlefske v. Winston
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 13, 1999No. 2:98CV1466PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiff, William R. Washlefske, a Virginia inmate, brings this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to redress alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated his rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments by taking his property without just compensation. Specifically, Washlefske alleges that defendants, acting pursuant to Virginia Code § 53.1 — 14, unconstitutionally retained the interest accrued on his “hold” and “spend” accounts, both of which are part of an Inmate Trust…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- William F. Washlefske v. Andrew J. Winston Ronald J. AngeloneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Neifert v. Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Hatfield v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Schneider v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Chalmers v. WinstonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.