Legal Opinion
Schneider v. California Department of Corrections
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 22, 2000No. C 96-1739 SIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On February 11, 2000, the Court heard argument on a motion for summary judgment by defendant C.A. Terhune, Director of the California Department of Corrections (“CDC”) and a motion for preliminary injunction by plaintiffs. Having carefully considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction.
BACKGROUND
1. Procedural History
Plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Napa Valley Publishing Co. v. City of CalistogaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Paul J. Schneider v. California Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Schneider v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- (PC) Hunter v. RouseDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020