Legal Opinion

Neifert v. Department of the Environment

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 14, 2006No. 10, September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

Eugenia M. Neifert, Melvin D. Krolczyk, and Teresa A. Krolczyk, appellants, own four lots in the Cape Isle of Wight subdivision in Worcester County. Appellants have been denied sewer service and wetland fill permits and therefore are unable to develop their lots. We must decide whether the Maryland Department of the Environment violated appellants’ equal protection rights by denying sewer service and whether the denial of sewer and wetland fill permits constitutes an unconstitutional taking. We shall hold that the denial of sewer service under the 1992 Policy satisfies rational…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  2. Conaway v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Frey v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Pulte Home Corporation v. Montgomery County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  5. Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API