Cumnock v. City of Little Rock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
(after stating the facts). The sole issue raised by the appeal is whether or not the city of Little Rock has the power to build a city hospital.
' In Spaulding v. City of Lowell, 23 Pick. (Mass.) 71, Chief Justice Shaw, speaking of municipal corporations, said: “They can exercise no powers but those which are conferred upon them by the act by which they are constituted, .or such as are necessary to the exercise of their corporate powers, the performance of their corporate duties, and the accomplishment of the purposes of their association. This principle is fairly derived from the nature of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ottawa v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Russell v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Wheelock v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Bates v. BassettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- Torrent v. Common Council of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. RainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Van Hovenberg v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Bourland v. PollockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Pfeifer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Williams v. DentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.