Legal Opinion

Vanlydegraf v. Scholz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The father of a six-year-old girl sues tO' recover as her guardian ad litem for her injuries and in his own behalf for his expenses in caring for them caused by her being struck by the automobile of defendant Scholz as she was crossing a street at an intersection. The child was going north, the car west. The child was struck shortly north of the center of the east-and-west street. A car was parked on the south side of the east-and-west street a short distance east of the north- and-south crosswalk. A third car traveling east was also crossing the intersection. The jury found the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DeGroot v. Van AkkerenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Schmidt v. RiessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Britten v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Enget Ex Rel. Enget v. NeffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brophy v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Blahnik v. DaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Volkmann v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API