Legal Opinion

State v. Damofle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 24, 1988No. CR86-03127; CA A43818; CR86-03303; CA A43841PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*622ROSSMAN, J.

Defendants appeal their convictions for criminal mistreatment in the second degree, contending that the trial court erred in denying their motions for acquittal under ORS 136.445. We affirm.

The material facts are not in dispute. Defendants lived with their three children, aged 5 months, 11/2 years, and 5 years, in a room constructed of plastic and wood inside a barn. The trial court found the following to be an accurate statement of the evidence presented at trial:

“On October 31,1986, the following conditions existed:
“1.) it was cold and wet inside;
“2.) it was musty and had an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McMasterOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. CornellOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Baker-KrofftOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. McCantsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. InloesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. Baker-KrofftCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API