Legal Opinion

State v. McCants

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 2009No. 06C44334, A134846 (Control), 06C45185, A134848PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendants Timothy McCants and Cynthia Walker, who were jointly tried, appeal, challenging their convictions on three counts each of first-degree criminal mistreatment, ORS 163.205(l)(a), which were based solely on conditions in defendants’ home. Each defendant contends on appeal that the state’s proof was legally insufficient to establish that he or she “intentionally or knowingly with[held] necessary and adequate * * * physical care,” ORS 163.205(l)(a), from any of defendants’ children. As explained below, we conclude that, viewing the evidence and reasonable attendant inferences in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. NessOregon Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Baker-KrofftOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. DrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Norwood v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. InloesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API