Legal Opinion

State v. Baker-Krofft

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 2009No. 06C53978; A135939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of criminal mistreatment in the second degree for withholding necessary and adequate physical care from her 11-year-old son, based on the condition of her home. ORS 163.200. She appeals, arguing that the trial court should have granted her motion for a judgment of acquittal because the state failed to prove that her son was significantly likely to be seriously harmed by the conditions of the home. We affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Hedrick, a compliance officer with the City of Salem’s public health authority, responded to a report by a patrol officer about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. DamofleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Baker-KrofftOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. McCantsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. InloesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. BurciagaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. DowtyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API