Legal Opinion
Bor. of Matawan v. Tree Haven Apartments, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 23, 1969PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
108 N.J. Super. 111 (1969)
260 A.2d 235
BOROUGH OF MATAWAN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
TREE HAVEN APARTMENTS, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, RESPONDENT. BOROUGH OF MATAWAN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
RAVINE APARTMENTS, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 24, 1969.
Decided December 23, 1969.
Before Judges KILKENNY, LABRECQUE and LEONARD.
Mr. Stephen C. Carton argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Carton, Nary, Witt &…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- City of Hackensack v. RubinsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of ClosterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- FMC Stores Co. v. Boro. of Morris PlainsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Continental Paper Co. v. Vil. Ridgefield Pk.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Devonshire Development Associates v. City of HackensackNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.