Lund v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered July 2, 1917, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained through an obstruction in a street.
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Respondent brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall occasioned by an obstruction that existed in one of the streets of the city of Seattle. The defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and its motions for an instructed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict returned in plain*301tiff’s favor, which, were overruled, present the chief question involved in this appeal—the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. This the trial court, in passing upon the several motions and in overruling the motion for a new trial,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- McCormack v. RobinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Coffey v. City of CarthageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Kiley v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Coffey v. City of CarthageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Ballard v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Goggin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Caruso v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.