Legal Opinion

Eccleston v. Gale

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1932No. Docket No. 4542PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J., pro tem.

This is a ease wherein 315,752 shares of stock were sold to satisfy a judgment of costs amounting to the sum of $9, which judgment was sold to the defendant Sue C. Gale for the sum of $16.14.

An examination of the transcript seems to show that one of the defendants in the case, Rex C. Gale, was a director and secretary in the corporation named as Centrifugal National Concentrator Company; that the stock sold herein was stock owned by the plaintiff herein, which was sold to the defendant Sue C. Gale, who was the mother of said Rex C. Gale.

The court found that neither the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Davis v. Rock Creek L. F. & M. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lucas v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Darden v. ReeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Lucas v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lucas v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API