Legal Opinion
Comey v. Hill
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 30, 1982PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.
The plaintiff appeals from judgments entered against him in favor of the defendants, trustees of R.E. Hill Co. (Hill Co.) and Automated Packaging Systems, Inc. (Automated). Automated cross appeals from a judgment entered against it in favor of the plaintiff and from the denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We transferred the appeals here on our own motion and we now affirm.
In June, 1977, the plaintiff, Comey, filed two complaints with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination alleging that Hill Co. and Automated discriminated against him on the basis of age…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wheelock College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Owen v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- D'Annolfo v. Stoneham Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Carroll v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United Truck Leasing Corp. v. GeltmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Ayash v. Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Welch v. CiampaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Charland v. Muzi Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.