Rhonda Maxwell v. Walden University, and Brightside Child and Family Advocacy
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION RHONDA MAXWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV425-323 ) WALDEN UNIVERSITY, and ) BRIGHTSIDE CHILD AND ) FAMILY ADVOCACY, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Plaintiff seeks leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) to 1) clarify her factual allegations, 2) add legal claims and theories from the factual circumstances underpinning the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), and 3) present more information concerning alleged damages. Doc. 60. Defendant Brightside Child and Family Advocacy, Inc. (“Brightside”) has responded in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Odessa Dee Hall v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Halliburton & Associates, Inc. v. Henderson, Few & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Florida Evergreen Foliage v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.