Odessa Dee Hall v. United Insurance Co. of America
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
The novel issue presented in this appeal involves the interplay between two Federal Rules of Evidence: 901(b)(2), which allows non-expert opinion testimony about the genuineness of handwriting evidence based on sufficient familiarity, and 701, which allows lay opinion testimony that is rationally based on personal perceptions. Plaintiff-appellant, Odessa Dee Hall (“Hall”), filed an affidavit stating that a signature on a document purporting to cancel an insurance policy with defendant-appellee, United Insurance Company of America (“United”), was not authentic. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Burger King Corp. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Charles McCorvey v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by338 opinions
- Cockrell v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Fred Dalton Brooks v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Tiffany Williams v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Maxine Cohen LandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Exigent Technology, Inc. v. Atrana Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.